Monday, April 12, 2010

♥ Wet n Wild - 'Blazed' ♥

Wet n' Wild Blazed - 3 coats RING 2 coats of White and 2 Coats of Wn'W Blazed = NO TOP COAT

"That color is offensive to me" -  This is what my DH said after a few hours of wear

I wore this polish earlier in the week, took a million photos and only 3 turned out okay. My perspective is that this is not a neon or fluorescent polish, but trying to get a good photo of my nails or my hands for that matter was impossible. My camera could not focus on this, and I dove myself nutz trying to get a good pic. It's not really a coral colour, its more of an orange/pink, if that makes any sense at all......

I plan on doing a little nail art with stickers, so I am not wearing a top coat with this at the moment. It is very shiny on it's own and so far has held up well, with no chipping or tip-wear. This really is a lovely shade, and for $1.87 CAD ( zellers stores at walmart it's $1.57) is worth having. Its a little on the sheer side, though, and my only complaint is that I wish it was a bit more opaque.

With 2 coats of white on my RING finger and then 2 coats of the 'Blazed' on top of that - it is definitely a very bright color - It doesn't seem as "harsh" as most neon corals = I like it ♥

~ Fluorescent ~

~ Fluorescent ~

~ Fluorescent ~

2 coats of 'blazed' - RING 2 coats of Billie White - this white undercoat definitely makes a huge difference.
~ Fluorescent ~


Finally , below photos form earlier this week when i wore blazed alone. I could not get a crisp and clear photo of this polish. i think this is a lovely shade and needs 3 coats  to look its best.
~ Fluorescent ~



No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...